Web28 sep. 2024 · In the recent case of Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others the tribunal considered whether the Claimant’s belief in supporting Rangers Football Club amounted to a philosophical belief. Mr McClung is a lifelong supporter of Glasgow Rangers Football Club. He worked as a subcontractor for Doosan Babcock via NRL recruitment … WebMr E McClung Claimant 15 In Person Doosan Babcock Ltd First Respondent Represented by: 20 Ms L Miller Solicitor NRL Ltd Second Respondent Represented by: 25 Mr …
Rangers fan launches discrimination case after
WebAn interesting Employment Tribunal case this week has ruled that supporting a football team was not a philosophical belief. In the Glasgow tribunal… WebIn the case of Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others, an ardent supporter of Glasgow Rangers Football Club [“Rangers FC”] claimed that his support for the club was a philosophical belief.He thus felt it should be recognised as a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010. This was rejected by the Employment Tribunal. palmdale breakfast
McClung v Doosan Babcock Croner-i
Web21 mrt. 2024 · This is why I love my job - there is something new every day including this Scottish case which found that supporting Rangers did not amount to a protected philosophical belief within the meaning ... Web16 sep. 2024 · In the case of McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others ETS/4110538/2024, the Claimant, Mr McClung, is a staunch and lifelong supporter of … WebMr E McClung Claimant In Person Doosan Babcock Ltd First Respondent Represented by: Ms L Miller - Solicitor NRL Ltd Second Respondent Represented by: Mr D Livingston … エグザイル アキラ リン・チーリン