WebJul 12, 2024 · Since Linux 2.6.12, NFS clients support flock () locks by emulating them as fcntl (2) byte-range locks on the entire file. This means that fcntl (2) and flock () locks do interact with one another over NFS. It also means that in order to place an exclusive lock, the file must be opened for writing. WebThe NFS file system where the repository is stored may be full The lock daemon (lockd) may not be running on the NFS server. UPDATE: following the update to the question, I'd suspect #3. Make sure that lockd is set up to start when the NFS server is rebooted. Share Improve this answer Follow answered Sep 2, 2009 at 16:53 gareth_bowles 8,987 9 33 42
flock(2) - Linux manual page - Michael Kerrisk
WebUsing flock, several processes can have a shared lock at the same time, or be waiting to acquire a write lock. How do I get a list of these processes? That is, for a given file X, … WebJun 20, 2024 · Solution: flock --close "man flock" says that --close will "Close the file descriptor on which the lock is held before executing command. This is useful if command spawns a child process which should not be holding the lock." This completely fixed my problem. Share Improve this answer Follow answered Mar 18, 2024 at 15:56 Dan Dalton … rayonier share price
linux - using flock with cron - Server Fault
WebThey lock a specified file or directory, which is created (assuming appropriate permissions) if it does not already exist. By default, if the lock cannot be immediately acquired, flock waits until the lock is available. The third form uses an open file by its file descriptor number. See the examples below for how that can be used. OPTIONS WebSet shared lock to directory /tmp and the second command will not fail. Notice that attempting to get exclusive lock with second command would fail. shell> flock -x local-lock-file echo 'a b c' Grab the exclusive lock "local-lock-file" before running echo with 'a b c'. WebStable Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed * FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ksmbd: fix possible memory leak in smb2_lock()" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree @ 2024-03-06 11:30 gregkh 0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread From: gregkh @ 2024-03-06 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: hbh25y, linkinjeon, stfrench; +Cc: stable The patch … simply active toothpaste